Diferencias entre la mejor marca en piscina de 25 vs 50 metros en la prueba de 200 estilos individual en relación al sexo

  1. Francisco Hermosilla Perona 1
  2. Emilio Beltrán Díaz 1
  3. Daniel Juarez Sántos-García 1
  1. 1 Laboratorio de Entrenamiento, Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Aldizkaria:
Revista de investigación en actividades acuáticas

ISSN: 2530-805X

Argitalpen urtea: 2023

Zenbakien izenburua: Monográfico 2023" La evaluación y el control del rendimiento en la natación"

Alea: 7

Zenbakia: 13

Orrialdeak: 13-15

Mota: Artikulua

Beste argitalpen batzuk: Revista de investigación en actividades acuáticas

Laburpena

Background: Competitive swimming takes place in both short (25 m) and long (50 m) pools. Swimmers usually have better times in the short pool due to the greater number of turns, so there is a correction factor to convert short pool times to equivalent long pool times. However, the differences between short and long pool times according to gender in the style events are not yet known. Objective: The main objective of this study is to analyse the differences between the best performance in a 200 freestyle event in short and long pool as a function of sex. Method: For this purpose, the best times achieved in short and long pool in the 200 freestyle event by 100 top Spanish national swimmers in two seasons were selected. Results: Data analysis was carried out using a Student's t-test for independent samples. The results show that in both sexes the best performance corresponds to the one achieved in the short pool (p<0.001). In turn, male swimmers show greater differences compared to females in the 200 individual medley between short and long pool (p<0.05). Conclusions: According to these results, we suggest the use of a different correction factor to be able to transform the times between short and long pool according to sex for the 200 individual medley.

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

  • Craig, A., Boomer, W., & Skehan, P. (1988). Patterns of velocity in competitive breaststroke swimming. Swimming science V, 18, 73- 77.
  • Dore, E., Martin, R., Ratel, S., Duché, P., Bedu, M., & Van Praagh, E. (2005). Gender differences in peak muscle performance during growth. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 26(04), 274-280.
  • Keskinen, Keskinen, K., & Mero, A. (2007). Effect of pool length on blood lactate, heart rate, and velocity in swimming. nternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 28(05), 407-413.
  • Keskinen, Keskinen, O., & Mero, A. (1996). Effect of pool length on biomechanical performance in front crawl swimming. Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming VII. London: E & FN Spon, Chapman & Hall, 216-220.
  • Lowensteyn, I., Perry, A., Nash, M., & Salhanich, D. (1994). Differences in peak blood lactate concentration in long course versus short course swimming. Journal of Swimming Research, 10, 31-34.
  • Seifert, L., Barbosa, T., & Kjendlie, P.-L. (2010). Biophysical approach to swimming: Gender effect. Gender gap: Causes, experiences and effects, 59-80.
  • Telford, R., Hahn, A., Catchpole, E., Parker, A., Sweetenham, W., Ungerechts, B., Wilke, K., Telford, R., Hahn, A., & Catchpole, E. (1988). Postcompetition blood lactate concentration in highly ranked Australian swimmers. Swimming science V. Int Series Sport Sci. IL: Human Kinetics, Champaign, 277-283.
  • Wirtz, W., Wilke, K., & Zimmermann, F. (1992). Velocity, distance per stroke and stroke frequency of highly skilled swimmers in 50-m freestyle sprint in a 50 and 25-m pool. Biomechanics and medicine in swimming: swimming science VI. E & FN Spon, Chapman & Hall, London, 131-134.
  • Wolfrum, M., Knechtle, B., Rüst, C. A., Rosemann, T., & Lepers, R. (2013). The effects of course length on freestyle swimming speed in elite female and male swimmers–a comparison of swimmers at national and international level. SpringerPlus, 2(1), 1-12.
  • Wolfrum, M., Rüst, C. A., Rosemann, T., Lepers, R., & Knechtle, B. (2014). The effect of course length on individual medley swimming performance in national and international athletes. Journal of human kinetics, 42(1), 187-200.