Estudio comparativo del test de Schirmer y BUT en relación con la etiología y gravedad del ojo seco

  1. JS López García
  2. I García Lozano
  3. A Smaranda
  4. J Martínez Garchitorena
Journal:
Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

ISSN: 0365-6691

Year of publication: 2005

Volume: 80

Issue: 5

Pages: 289-296

Type: Article

DOI: 10.4321/S0365-66912005000500006 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmologia

Abstract

Purpose: To determine possible differences between the Schirmer test and the tear break up time (BUT) in relation to the etiology and severity of the dry eye syndrome. Methods: We present a prospective study of 206 eyes in 106 patients (38 males and 68 females). Both the Schirmer test and BUT were performed on all of them. We divided the patients into ten etiologic groups according to the Madrid triple classification of dry eye etiology and into four groups according to clinical severity. Results: Both the Schirmer test and BUT results decrease according to the severity of symptoms and we found significant differences between clinical groups. In regard to etiology, we found lower values of the Schirmer test especially in immunological, senile and traumatic dry eye groups. BUT measures were lower in immunological, inflammatory and tantalic dry eye groups. Conclusions: Although we found differences between Schirmer test results and BUT values according to dry eye etiology, these differences were only statistically significant between the immunological group and the other groups. Differences between etiological groups decreased with worsening of the illness due to a general affectation of the lacrimal glands.

Bibliographic References

  • Rolando, M, Refojo, MF, Kenyon, KR. (1983). Increased tear evaporation in eyes with keratoconjuctivitis sicca. Arch Ophthalmol. 101. 557-558
  • Rivas, L, Oroza, MA, Perez-Esteban, A, Murube-del-Castillo, J. (1992). Morphological changes in ocular surface in dry eyes and other disorders by impression cytology. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 230. 329-334
  • Isreb, MA, Greiner, JV, Korb, DR, Glonek, T, Mody, SS, Finnemore, VM. (2003). Correlation of lipid layer thickness measurements with fluorescein tear film break-up time and Schirmer`s test. Eye. 17. 79-83
  • Murube, J.. (1997). Ojo Seco-Dry Eye. Sociedad Española de OftalmologíaTecnimedia editorial, S.L. Madrid.
  • Norn, MS.. (1994). The Dry Eye. Springer-Verlag Ibérica. Barcelona.
  • Kallarackal, GU, Ansari, EA, Amos, N, Martín, JC, Lane, C, Camilleri, JP. (2002). A comparative study to assess the clinical use or Fluorescein Meniscus Time (FMT) with Tear Break up Time (TBUT) and Schirmer´s test (ST) in the diagnosis of dry eyes. Eye. 16. 594-600
  • Murube, J, Zhuo, C.. (1997). Ojo Seco-Dry Eye. Sociedad Española de OftalmologíaTecnimedia editorial, S.L. Madrid.
  • Clinch, TE, Benedetto, DA, Felber, NT, Laibson, PR. (1983). Schirmer`s test: A closer look. Arch Ophthalmol. 101. 1383-1386
  • De Haas, EB. (1964). The pathogenesis of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Ophthalmologica. 147. 1-18
  • Korb, DR, Greiner, JV, Herman, J. (2001). Comparison of fluorescein break-up time measurement reproducibility using standard fluorescein strips versus the Dry Eye Test (DET) method. Cornea. 20. 811-815
  • de Paiva, CS, Lindsey, JL, Pflugfelder, SC. (2003). Assessing the severity of keratitis sicca with videokeratoscopic indices. Ophthalmology. 110. 1102-1109
  • Goto, T, Zheng, X, Klyce, SD, Kataoka, H, Uno, T, Karon, M. (2003). A new method for tear film stability analysis using videokeratography. Am J Ophthalmol. 135. 607-612
  • Lopez Garcia, JS, Garcia Lozano, I, Martinez Garchitorena, J. (2003). Estudio de los pliegues lacunares en el diagnóstico de ojo seco. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 78. 21-27
  • Korb, DR. (2000). Survey of preferred tests for diagnosis of the tear film and dry eye. Cornea. 19. 483-486
  • Murube, J.. (1997). Ojo Seco-Dry Eye. Sociedad Española de OftalmologíaTecnimedia editorial, S.L. Madrid.
  • Calonge, M. (2002). Síndrome de ojo seco: ¿existen esperanzas para un tratamiento curativo?. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 77. 119-120
  • Rolando, M, Refojo, MF. (1983). Tear evaporimeter for measuring water evaporation rate from the tear film under controlled conditions in humans. Exp Eye Res. 36. 25-33
  • Murube, J.. (2001). Síndrome de Sjögren y su nuevo tratamiento: Update symposium. Sanded, S.L. Barcelona.
  • Lamberts, DW, Foster, CS, Henry, D, Perry, HD. (1979). Schirmer test after topical anesthesia and the tear meniscus height in normal eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 97. 1082-1085
  • Gomez, S, Herreras, JM, Perez, S, Perez, H, Calonge, M, Pastor, JC. (1997). Test diagnósticos del síndrome de ojo seco asociado a blefaritis: Utilidad de la anestesia tópica. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 72. 437-444
  • Jordan, A, Baum, J. (1980). Basic tear flow: Does it exist?. Ophthalmology. 87. 920-930
  • Mackor, AJ, Van Bijsterveld, OP. (1988). Tear function parameters in keratoconjunctivitis sicca with and without the association of Sjogren`s syndrome. Ophthalmologica. 196. 169-174
  • Serrano Garcia, M, Gonzalez De La Rosa, M, Mesa Moreno, C, Cardona Guerra, P. (1987). Estudio fluorofotométrico de la lagrimación basal o periparético. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol. 53. 745-748
  • Rolando, M, Macri, A.. (1997). Ojo Seco-Dry Eye. Sociedad Española de OftalmologíaTecnimedia editorial, S.L. Madrid.
  • Wyon, NM, Wyon, DP. (1987). Measurement of acute response to draught in the eye. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 65. 385-392
  • Tutt, R, Bradley, A, Begley, C, Thibos, LN. (2000). Optical and visual impact of tear break-up in human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 41. 4117-4123
  • Goto, E, Shimazaki, J, Monden, Y, Tacano, Y, Yagi, Y, Shimmura, S. (2002). Low-concentration homogenized castor oil eye drops for noninflamed obstructive meibomian gland dysfuntion. Ophthalmology. 109. 2030-2035
  • Mathers, WD, Shields, WJ, Sachdev, MS, Petroll, WM, Jester, JV. (1991). Meibomian gland dysfuntion in chronic blepharitis. Cornea. 10. 277-285
  • Franck, C. (1991). Fatty layer of the precorneal film in the «office eye syndrome». Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 69. 737-743