Risk of bias in dentistry-related randomized controlled trials in spanish language journals

  1. Conchita Martin 1
  2. Isabel Delgado 1
  3. Rosa Rojo 2
  4. Rafael Souper 3
  5. Carola Veliz 3
  6. Josefina Salazar 4
  7. Marlene Diaz 5
  8. Javier Cuellar 6
  9. Matías Dallaserra 3
  10. Xavier Bofill 4
  11. Josefina Bendersky 3
  12. Sebastian Zapata 3
  13. Julio Villanueva 3
  1. 1 Universidad Complutense de Madrid
    info

    Universidad Complutense de Madrid

    Madrid, España

    ROR 02p0gd045

  2. 2 Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
    info

    Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

    Madrid, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01v5cv687

  3. 3 Universidad de Chile
    info

    Universidad de Chile

    Santiago de Chile, Chile

    ROR https://ror.org/047gc3g35

  4. 4 Hospital San Borja Arriarán
    info

    Hospital San Borja Arriarán

    Santiago de Chile, Chile

    ROR https://ror.org/04qdwp261

  5. 5 Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau) and CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)
  6. 6 Univiersity of Chile
Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
International journal of interdisciplinary dentistry

ISSN: 2452-5588,  2452-5596

Año de publicación: 2023

Volumen: 16

Número: 2

Páginas: 137-141

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.4067/S2452-55882023000200137 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: International journal of interdisciplinary dentistry

Resumen

ABSTRACT: Objectives: To assess the risk of bias (RoB) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in dental journals in the Spanish language. Methods: A systematic retrospective survey was conducted of all RCTs published from 1980 to 2019 in dentistry Spanish and Latin American journals. We extracted data and performed RoB assessments using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results: 292 RCTs published in 51 journals were included. The best-rated domains were incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other biases. The domains assessed with higher proportions of an unclear or high risk of bias were sequence generation, allocation concealment, and blinding of outcome assessment. There is a low proportion of RCTs published in Spanish language journals. However, the number has been increasing over the years, and the low risk of bias assessment rates across domains show an increasing trend. Conclusions: A low percentage of Spanish-language dental journals issue RCTs. Our assessment of these RCTs’ RoB suggests higher difficulties in the design and conduction phase than in the posterior reporting stage.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alamri, HM,Alharbi, F. (2018). Quality Assessment of randomized clinical trials reporting in endodontic journals: An observational study from 2012 to 2017. J Endod. 44. 1246
  • Bonfill, X,Ballesteros, M,Gich, I,Serrano, MA,García López, F,Urrútia, G. (2013). Description of the protocols for randomized controlled trials on cancer drugs conducted in Spain (1999-2003). PLoS ONE. 8.
  • Hulley, SB. (2013). Designing Clinical Research. 4. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Dickersin, K,Scherer, R,Lefebvre, C. (1994). Systematic reviews: identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ. 309. 1286
  • Higgins, JPT,Altman, DG,Sterne, JAC. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 81-873
  • Fleming, PS,Buckley, N,Seehra, J,Polychronopoulou, A,Pandis, N. (2012). Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 2011. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 142. 451
  • Turner, L,Shamseer, L,Altman, DG. Cochrane Methodology Review Group Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
  • Cairo, F,Sanz, I,Matesanz, P,Nieri, M,Pagliaro, U. (2012). Quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in implant dentistry. A systematic review on critical aspects in design, outcome assessment and clinical relevance. J Clin Periodontol. 39. 81-107
  • Elangovan, S,Prakasam, S,Gajendrareddy, P,Allareddy, V. (2016). A risk of bias assessment of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on periodontal regeneration published in 2013. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 16. 30-40
  • Wood, L,Egger, M,Gluud, LL. (2008). Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 336. 601
  • Moher, D,Jadad, AR,Nichol, G,Penman, M,Tugwell, P,Walsh, S. (1995). Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists. Control Clin Trials. 16. 62-73
  • Crowe, M,Sheppard, L. (2011). A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 64. 79-89
  • Juni, P. (2001). Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 323. 42
  • Thomas, J,Chandler, J,Cumpston, M,Li, T,Page, MJ,Welch, VA. Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
  • Higgins, JPT,Green, S. (2008). Cochrane Collaboration Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Al-Namankany, AA,Ashley, P,Moles, DR,Parekh, S. (2009). Assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized clinical trials in paediatric dentistry journals. Int J Paediatr Dent. 19. 318
  • Oomens, MAEM,Heymans, MW,Forouzanfar, T. (2013). Risk of bias in research in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 51. 913
  • Villanueva, J,Delgado, I,Saldarriaga, JR. (2018). Identification and description of controlled clinical trials in Spanish language dental journals. Health Info Libr J. 35. 192-201
  • Pardo-Hernandez, H,Urrútia, G,Barajas-Nava, LA. (2017). BADERI: an online database to coordinate handsearching activities of controlled clinical trials for their potential inclusion in systematic reviews. Trials. 18. 273
  • Bachelet, VC,Carrasco, VA,Bravo-Córdova, F. (2020). Quality of reporting for randomised clinical trials published in Latin American and Spanish journals: A protocol for a systematic survey of three clinical specialities. BMJ Open. 10.
  • Bonfill, X,Osorio, D,Posso, M. (2015). Identification of biomedical journals in Spain and Latin America. Health Info Libr J. 32. 276
  • Gutarra-Vilchez, RB,Pardo-Hernandez, H,Arévalo-Rodríguez, I,Buitrago, D,Bonfill, X. (2016). Identification and description of controlled clinical trials published in Spanish Gynaecology and Obstetrics journals and risk of bias assessment of trials on assisted reproductive techniques. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 203. 5-11
  • Loezar, C,Madrid, E,Jahr, C. (2018). Identification and description of controlled clinical trials published in Spanish Ophthalmology Journals. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 25. 436
  • Turrillas, M,Sitjà-Rabert, M,Pardo, H. (2017). Identification and description of controlled clinical trials published in Physiotherapy journals in Spain. J Eval Clin Pract. 23. 29-36
  • Chan, AW,Altman, DG. (2005). Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors. BMJ. 330. 753
  • Schulz, KF,Altman, DG,Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 340. 332
  • Pildal, J,Chan, AW,Hróbjartsson, A,Forfang, E,Altman, DG,Gøtzsche, PC. (2005). Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study. BMJ. 330. 1049
  • Reveiz, L,Chapman, E,Asial, S,Munoz, S,Bonfill, X,Alonso-Coello, P. (2015). Risk of bias of randomized trials over time. J Clin Epidemiol. 68. 1036
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet