Parental interference in custody variation proceedings: a forensic psychology perspective

Erreferentzia bibliografikoak

• Sarrió IG. Las Interferencias Parentales y la Alienación Parental en el contexto jurídico español: revisión de sentencias judiciales en materia de guarda y custodia [Tesis doctoral]. Universidad de Valencia. 2016.
• Nuñez N, Elizabeth M. El fenómeno de la interferencia parental susceptible de una medida de protección. Universidad de Chile. 2018.
• Jaffe P, Lemon NKD, Poisson SE. Child custody & domestic violence: a call for safety and accountability. Sage Publications. 2003.
• Johnston JR, Campbell LEG. Impasses of divorce: the dynamics and resolution of family conflict. Free Press. 1988.
• Fletcher KE, Steinberg AM, Williams S. Developmentally sensitive assessment of trauma and stress disorders. In Schein LA, Spitz HI, Burlingame GM, et al. Psychological effects of catastrophic disasters: group approaches to treatment. Haworth Press. 2007:227-242.
• Baker AJL. Adult children of parental alienation syndrome: breaking the ties that bind. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;17(4):232.
• Huerta AT, Bartumeus AM, Orellana NV. Programa de intervención para víctimas de interferencias parentales (PIVIP). EOS. 2013.
• Gardner RA. Parental alienation syndrome vs. parental alienation: which diagnosis should evaluators use in child-custody disputes? Am J Fam Ther. 2002;30(2):93-115.
• Warshak RA. Ten parental alienation fallacies that compromise decisions in court and in therapy. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2015;46(4):235-249.
• Baker AJL, Ami NB. To turn a child against a parent is to turn a child against himself. J Divorce Remarriage. 2011;52(7):472-489.
• Bernet W, Baker AJL, et al. Parental alienation, DSM-V, and ICD-11: response to critics. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2013;41(1):98-104.
• Gardner RA. Recent trends in divorce and custody litigation. The Academy Forum. 1985;29(2):3-7.
• Gardner RA. Family evaluation and child custody, mediation, arbitration and litigation. Creative Therapeutics. 1989.
• Kelly JB, Johnston JR. The alienated child: a reformulation of parental alienation syndrome. Fam Court Rev. 2001;39(3):249-266.
• Baker AJL. The long-term effects of parental alienation on adult children: a qualitative research study. Am J Fam Ther. 2005;34(1):63-78.
• Warshak RA. Family bridges: using insights from social science to reconnect parents and alienated children. Fam Court Rev. 2010;48(1):48-80.
• Fidler BJ, Bala N. Children resisting postseparation contact with a parent: concepts, controversies, and conundrums. Fam Court Rev. 2010;48(1):10-47.
• Emery RE. Renegotiating family relationships: divorce, child custody and mediation. Guilford Press. 2012.
• Kelly JB. Children's living arrangements following separation and divorce: insights from empirical and clinical research. Fam Process. 2007;46(1):35-52.
• Drozd LM, Olesen NW. Is it abuse, alienation, and/or estrangement? A decision tree. J Child Custody. 2004;1(3):65-106.
• Marín M, Dujo V, Horcajo PJ. Estudio comparativo de las decisiones de los magistrados del Tribunal Supremo español y los resultados de estudios empíricos sobre las implicaciones psicológicas en menores en situación de guarda y custodia compartida. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica. 2017;27(1):115-125.
• Ley 15/2005, de 8 de julio, por la que se modifica el Código Civil y la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil en materia de separación y divorcio. Boletín Oficial del Estado. 2005;164:25561-25567.
• Child custody and support. American Bar Association (ABA). 2017.
• Johnston JR, Roseby V. In the name of the child: a developmental approach to understanding and helping children of conflicted and violent divorce. Fam Court Rev. 2005;36(2):317-319.
• Baker AJL, Darnall D. Behaviors and strategies employed in parental alienation: a survey of parental experiences. J Divorce Remarriage. 2006;45(1-2):97-124.
• Fernández PVM, de la Subtil IO. Emotional suffering of parents in judicial proceedings for variation of custody arrangements. J Foren Legal Invest Sci. 2024;10:98.
• Ellis EM, Boyan SB. The essentials of parental alienation syndrome (PAS): what it is and how to help. Professional Resource Press. 2010.
• Warshak RA. Parental alienation: overview, management, intervention, and practice tips. J Am Acad Matrim Law. 2015;28:181-248.
• Gould JW, Martindale DA. The art and science of child custody evaluations. The Guilford Press. 2007.
• Lobbestael J, Leurgans M, Arntz A. Inter-rater reliability of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders (SCID I) and axis II disorders (SCID II). Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18(1):75-79.
• Ackerman MJ, Ackerman MC. Custody evaluation practices: a survey of experienced professionals (revisited). Prof Psychol Res Pract. 1997;28(2):137-145.
• Gardner RA. The parental alienation syndrome: a guide for mental health and legal professionals. Creative Therapeutics. 1992.
• Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004;4(6):561-571.
• Beck AT, Steer RA, Carbin MG. Psychometric properties of the beck depression inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8(1):77-100.
• Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32(1):50-55.
• Achenbach TM. Manual for the child behavior checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry. 1991;
• Perry JC, Bond M, Roy C. Predictors of treatment duration and retention in a study of long-term dynamic psychotherapy: childhood adversity, adult personality, and diagnosis. J Psychiatr Pract. 2007;13(4):221-232.
• Johnston MV, Ishida A, Ishida WN, et al. Plasticity and injury in the developing brain. Brain Dev. 2009;31(1):1-10.
• Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:591-621.
• Bala N. Assessments for postseparation parenting disputes in Canada. Fam Court Rev. 200;42(3):485-510.
• Emery RE. Interparental conflict and the children of discord and divorce. Psychol Bull. 1982;92(2):310-330.
• Stahl PM. Conducting child custody evaluations: from basic to complex issues. The Handbook Forensic Psychology. 4th ed. 2010:137-169.
• Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American psychological association (APA). 2017.
• Borum R, Otto R. Advances in forensic assessment and treatment: an overview and introduction to the special issue. Law Hum Behav. 2000;24(1):1-7.
• Guidelines for child custody evaluations in family law proceedings. American Psychological Association (APA). 2022.
• Brantley H.T, Drogin EY, Maddux JA. Guidelines for child custody evaluations in family law proceedings: implications for the courts. The American Psychological Association's. 2022;58:52-56.
• Kohm LM. Tracing the foundations of the best interests of the child standard in American jurisprudence. J L Fam Stud. 2007;10:337-376.
• Bajackson E. Best interests of the child- a legislative journey still in motion. J Am Acad Matrim Law. 2012;25:311-355.
• Iierson KV. Principles of biomedical ethics. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1999;17(2):283-206.
• Gudjonsson GH. The psychology of interrogations and confessions: a handbook. Chichester: Wiley. 2003.
• Herman JL. Trauma and recovery: the aftermath of violence- from domestic abuse to political terror. Hachette book group. 2022.
• Johnston JR. Parental Alignments and Rejection: An Empirical Study of Alienation in Children of Divorce. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2003;31(2):158-170.
• Deutsch R. Divorce in the 21st century: multidisciplinary family interventions. Fam Court Rev. 2008;36(1):41-66.
• Kelly JB. Parenting coordination for high-conflict families. Fam Court Rev. 2010;48(1):72-85.
• Minuchin S. Families and family therapy. Routledge. 2018.
• Nichols MP, Davis SD. Family therapy: concepts and methods (11th ed.). Pearson. 2016.
• Reiter MD. Handbook of family therapy. Routledge. 2017.
• Emery CR. Disorder or deviant order? Re-theorizing domestic violence in terms of order, power and legitimacy: a typology. Aggression Violent Behav. 2011;16(6):525-540.
• Emery RE, Sbarra D, Grover T. Divorce mediation: research and reflections. Fam Court Rev. 2005;43(1):22-37.
• Hetherington EM. Coping with divorce, single parenting, and remarriage: a risk and resiliency perspective. Routledge. 2009.
• Beck JS. Cognitive behavior therapy: basics and beyond. Guilford Publications. 2020.
• Stallard P. Think good - feel good: a cognitive behaviour therapy workbook for children and young people. Wiley. 2002.
• Ackerman MJ. Clinician's guide to child custody evaluations. John Wiley & Sons. 2006;46(7):888-889.
• Bow JN, Gould JW, Flens JR. Examining parental alienation in child custody cases: a survey of mental health and legal professionals. Am J Fam Ther. 2009;37(2):127-145.
• Ackerman MJ, Pritzl TB. Child custody evaluation practices: a 20-year follow-up. Fam Court Rev. 2011;49(3):618-628.
• Heilbrun, K. Child custody evaluation: critically assessing mental health experts and psychological tests. Fam Law Quarter. 1995;63-78.
• Greenberg, SA, Shuman DW. Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. In Clinical Forensic Psychology and Law. Routledge. 2019;28(1):50-57.
• Dale MD, Gould J, Levine A. Cross-examining experts in child custody: the necessary theories and models... with instructions. J Am Acad Matrim Law. 2021;33:327-391.
• Martindale DA. Cross-examining mental health experts in child custody litigation. J Psychiatry Law. 2001;29(4):483-511.
• Melton GB, Petrila J, Poythress NG, et al. Psychological evaluations for the courts: a handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers. Guilford Publications. 2017.
• Johnston JR. A child-centered approach to high-conflict and domestic-violence families: differential assessment and interventions. J Fam Stud. 2006;12(1):15-35.
• Saini M, Johnston JR, Fidler BJ, et al. Empirical studies of alienation. New York, NY. Oxford University Press. 2006;2:374-430.
• Dalton C, Carbon S, Olesen N. High conflict divorce, violence, and abuse: implications for custody and visitation decisions. Juven Fam Court. 2003;54(4):11-33.
• Pepiton MB, Zelgowski BR, Geffner R, et al. Ethical violations: What can and does go wrong in child custody evaluations? J Child Custody. 2014;11(2):81-100.
• Saunders DG. Research based recommendations for child custody evaluation practices and policies in cases of intimate partner violence. J Child Custody. 2015;12(1):71-92.
• Echeburúa E, Muñoz JM, Loinaz I. La evaluación psicológica forense frente a la evaluación clínica: propuestas y retos de futuro. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2011;11(1):141-159.
• Greenberg LR, Gould JW. The treating expert: a hybrid role with firm boundaries. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2001;32(5):469-478.
• Rose J, Spitz HI, Burlingame G, Schein L, et al. Psychological effects of catastrophic disasters. Group approaches to treatment. 2006; 227-242.
• Gudjonsson GH. The psychology of interrogations and confessions. In investigative interviewing. Willan. 2013;123-146.