Lo impactante que es tener un buen factor de impacto

  1. Celada, Paloma
Journal:
Journal of Negative and No Positive Results: JONNPR

ISSN: 2529-850X

Year of publication: 2017

Volume: 2

Issue: 9

Pages: 384-387

Type: Article

DOI: 10.19230/JONNPR.1553 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Journal of Negative and No Positive Results: JONNPR

Institutional repository: lock_openOpen access Editor

Abstract

This paper ironically analyzes about the impact factor, a quality index that obsesses scientific journals and the authors who risk to in them. It also criticizes why this factor is unfair in assessing the merits of scientific researchs and what it means for researchers and some publishers. Using a humorous touch but also under a very serious scientific point of view, the validity of the impact factor is questioned to define the quality and credibility of a scientific journal. 

Bibliographic References

  • Franco-López A., Sanz-Valero J., Culebras JM. El factor de impacto ya no es el patrón oro; la declaración de San Francisco sobre evaluación de la investigación. JONNPR. 2017; 2(5): 173-176.
  • Garfield, E. Journal citation reports. Current contents. 1976; 30: 5-20.
  • Gil A. Tratado de nutrición. Editorial Médica Panamericana: Buenos Aires; 2017.
  • Sánchez-Muniz FJ., Bastida S. Y aún dicen que el pescado es caro. JONNPR. 2016; 1(7): 239-243.