Lo impactante que es tener un buen factor de impacto

  1. Celada, Paloma
Revue:
Journal of Negative and No Positive Results: JONNPR

ISSN: 2529-850X

Année de publication: 2017

Volumen: 2

Número: 9

Pages: 384-387

Type: Article

DOI: 10.19230/JONNPR.1553 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccès ouvert editor

D'autres publications dans: Journal of Negative and No Positive Results: JONNPR

Dépôt institutionnel: lock_openAccès ouvert Editor

Résumé

This paper ironically analyzes about the impact factor, a quality index that obsesses scientific journals and the authors who risk to in them. It also criticizes why this factor is unfair in assessing the merits of scientific researchs and what it means for researchers and some publishers. Using a humorous touch but also under a very serious scientific point of view, the validity of the impact factor is questioned to define the quality and credibility of a scientific journal. 

Références bibliographiques

  • Franco-López A., Sanz-Valero J., Culebras JM. El factor de impacto ya no es el patrón oro; la declaración de San Francisco sobre evaluación de la investigación. JONNPR. 2017; 2(5): 173-176.
  • Garfield, E. Journal citation reports. Current contents. 1976; 30: 5-20.
  • Gil A. Tratado de nutrición. Editorial Médica Panamericana: Buenos Aires; 2017.
  • Sánchez-Muniz FJ., Bastida S. Y aún dicen que el pescado es caro. JONNPR. 2016; 1(7): 239-243.